Re: [LCA2011-Chat] Some Anti-Harassment Policies considered harmful

From: follower <follower_at_rancidbacon.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:16:34 +1000

On 3 February 2011 02:07, Theodore Tso <tytso_at_mit.edu> wrote:
> People have complimented the Linux Foundation conference events as being
> much more professional and much more welcoming of women.   I suspect at least
> part of it is because most of the people there don't go out on drunken bar crawls
> afterwards, and that's at least as important, if not more important than having an
> explicit anti-harassment policy.  (To date, the LF events don't have such a thing,
> which proves you can have a good run of conferences without having an explicit
> policy in place.)
FWIW, it seems according to
<http://geekfeminism.org/2010/12/16/friendly-conference-update/> LF
have now adopted an anti-harassment policy.

--Philip;

_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
Chat_at_lca2011.linux.org.au
http://lists.followtheflow.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
Received on Thu Feb 03 2011 - 13:16:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 19:34:12 GMT